But He Is Already Gone!
By Greg Litmer

Bible students recognize that the Scriptures teach the need for church discipline. Discipline itself is a somewhat generic word with a much wider meaning than folks are normally inclined to give it. Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary provides the following definitions:

  1. Training to act in accordance with rules; drill.
  2. Activity, exercise, or a regimen that develops or improves a skill; training.
  3. Punishment inflicted by way of correction and training.
  4. The rigor or training effect of experience, adversity, etc.
  5. Behavior in accord with rules of conduct.
  6. A set or system of rules and regulations.
  7. Eccles. The system of government regulating the practice of a church as distinguished from its doctrine.
  8. An instrument of punishment, esp. a whip or scourge, used in the practice of self-mortification or as an instrument of chastisement in certain religious communities.
  9. A branch of instruction or learning.
  10. To train by instruction and exercise; drill.
  11. To bring to a state of order and obedience by training and control.
  12. To punish or penalize in order to train and control; correct; chastise.

Obviously, not all of these definitions are germane to the Biblical concept of discipline, but many of them are. The Hebrew word "musar" is equivalent to our word "discipline." It comes from "yasar." Yasar means "to bind, to tame; hence to correct, chastise, instruct, admonish." The words are used in the Old Testament concerning the disciplinary action of a parent toward his child, and of the disciplinary action of God toward His people.

The Greek equivalent of "discipline" is "paideia," which means "to bring up, rear a child; to train and teach, educate; to chasten, discipline." This word is used in Ephesians 6:4 to refer to bringing up a child in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Forms of the word are used eight times in Hebrews 12:5-11, which discusses the necessity of discipline, both by earthly parents and by God. Discipline involves all of the training done up to and including withdrawal.

There are others, as well, against whom the church should take such steps, but this gets the idea across.

If there were no Scriptural reason to do this, other than the fact that it is commanded, that would be more than sufficient. Passages such as 2 Thessalonians 3:6 are as clear and as explicit as Acts 2:38. However, failure to withdraw fellowship shows a lack of love and concern for the erring brother or sister. In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul wrote about a brother who was caught up in a sin of immorality and was not repenting. He wrote in verse 5, "To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus." The primary purpose of such a step is to save the individual from eternal damnation.

Let's go back to 2 Thessalonians 3:6 and more closely examine a few of the words used in that passage.

We often hear the statement, or one similar to it, "You can't withdraw from someone who has already left the congregation." That sounds reasonable, but one should never make or believe such a statement unless it can be substantiated by book, chapter, and verse. Where does the New Testament speak of one "quitting," or walking away from, a faithful congregation of the Lord's people to engage in unauthorized activities, and that person's actions removing the responsibility of the last faithful congregation of which they were a part? How much more "disorderly" and "out of rank" can a person get than to walk away from the Lord's church to participate in man-made traditions and religious practices? Since this is a military term, you who are veterans, consider what would have happened if you had walked away, went AWOL, from your legitimate military service.

Can Christians who want to continue in fornication simply say that they are leaving the congregation and consequently not be subject to withdrawal? Should we just let them go, or should we do what the Lord commands? Such reasoning says that all a person has to do is say, "I'm leaving, I no longer want to be considered a member here," and our responsibility toward them ends. That is not true! Love demands that we take the final step in an effort to save their souls, and quite frankly, ours as well. I have known of people who said they were leaving a congregation, without repenting of sins they had committed there, in order to avoid being disciplined - thus blatantly attempting to manipulate God and His people. This cannot be! I have searched for 30 years and have not found the passage which says that if a person just walks away, our responsibility toward him ends. Where is the passage that even hints at such an idea?